The first half of this is CNN interviewing Vivek Ramaswamy and attempting to do “gotcha” journalism. It’s a sleazy as it gets. The host attempts to take several instances of previous statements out of context or flat out mischaracterize what he said. Ramaswamy does not have any part of it. They try to paint him as a conspiracy theorist on 9/11. He punches back with flat out facts. While I do believe the government was involved in 9/11. I do know that person with presidential aspirations openly stating that would be political suicide. To me I always ask who benefitted. The government most certainly did from 9/11. The beginning of many war that lined the pockets of the military industrial complex. This has been that basis for false flags in the past. The Patriot Act that gutted the citizens rights. Too many examples. Either they were involved tor they masterfully exploited the event. I believe the former simply because the events of the day as portrayed could not have knock 3 buildings down directly their footprints as if they were precisely demolished by professional implosion experts. Molten steel at the site for weeks when the product of the buildings and fuel could not produce anywhere near the heat to melt steel. It does not add up and only supports an inside job. Regardless, I am liking Vivek Ramaswamy more and more. On the debate stage he openly stated the climate change is a “hoax”. I don’t believe this is his time. Too much pent up aggression in the masses for what has and is happening to President Trump. I believe he would be a good running mate for Trump and perhaps in 4 years he would be the man.

Vivek Ramaswamy on 9/11
Vivek Ramaswamy on 9/11

Leave a Reply